Techironic

Hay mucha gente inteligente en la red que se aprovechan de los rumores para darse publicidad, a costa de las grandes empresas. En mi opinión este es uno de los casos donde jsnell, aprovechandose un poco de los problemas que ha tenido Apple, con su Apple Store bloqueando aplicaciones, intenta ganar un poco de publicidad diciendo que su app ha sido rechazada únicamente porque contenía la palabra iphone en su título, para unas horas mas tarde decir Opps si me aprobaron mi app en el itunes store yupi!.

De verdad espero que la guía sea lo suficientemente buena como para que amerite 4$ y su descarga ya que si no lo es, ni entendería todo el revuelo que quería formar con todo esto que hasta Engadget se hizo eco.

En 1984 pasaron muchas cosas en la compañía de la manzanita, solo con ver “Los piratas de Silicon Valley“, nos damos cuenta por lo que paso Apple hasta llegar al punto de convertirse en lo que es hoy en día.

Muchas crítica ha tenido desde sus inicios hasta hoy en día críticas como:

• Byte, Gregg Williams, Febrero 1984
  • The Macintosh brings us one step closer to the ideal of computer as appliance.
• Creative Computing, John Anderson Julio 1984

In its current form, the Macintosh is the distilled embodiment of a promise: the software can be intuitively easy to use, while remaining just as powerful as anything else around. It is now time to lay out the “bads”:

• The Macintosh does not have enough RAM.
• Single microfloppy is slow and inadequate.
• There are no internal expansion slots or external expansion buses.
• MacWrite has some severe limitations.
• The system is monochrome only.
• MS-DOS compatibility is ruled out.
• The Macintosh will not multitask.
• You can’t use a Mac away from a desk.
• MacPaint has an easel size limitation.
• Forget about external video.
• Macintosh software development is an involved process.

• Bill Gates
  • Anybody who could write a good application on a 128K Mac deserves a medal.
• InfoWorld, Thomas Neudecker, 26 March 1984
  • We think Apple has at least one thing right — the Macintosh is the one machine with the potential to challenge IBM’s hold on the market
• The Seybold Report, Jonathan and Andrew Seybold
  • Apple also got some important things wrong. Our biggest worry is that Mac may be under-configured… But the dumbest thing Apple did with the whole development effort was to allow two different operating systems for Mac and Lisa.
• San Francisco Examiner, John C. Dvorak, 19 Feb. 1984
  • The nature of the personal computer is simply not fully understood by companies like Apple (or anyone else for that matter). Apple makes the arrogant assumption of thinking that it knows what you want and need. It, unfortunately, leaves the “why” out of the equation — as in “why would I want this?” The Macintosh uses an experimental pointing device called a ‘mouse’. There is no evidence that people want to use these things. I dont want one of these new fangled devices.
• David Bunnell, Macworld, from The Macintosh Reader
  • Borland founder Philippe Kahn was half right in January 1985 when he called the early Macintosh a “piece of s___.” It was underpowered, had very little software, no hard drive, no compelling applications like desktop publishing, and was marketed by a company that seemed to be near death. I can’t help but be amused by all the pumped-up bravado I hear and read about the people who created the Macintosh. To hold up the Macintosh experience as an example of how to create a great product, launch an industry, or spark a revolution is a cruel joke.

Vía: brainstormtech

Para los amantes de las bases de datos, y para los que son un tanto mas geek que el resto del mundo, Oracle 11g trae una nueva funcionalidad como nos cuentan en AMIS, esta funcionalidad son los Recursive Subquery, que según explican es una especie de sustituto para realizar conexiones con querys jerárquicos. La aplicación más sencilla que vieron ellos para demostrar como funcionan es la resolución de Sudokus.

Supongamos que tenemos el siguiente Sudoku.

[...]